When state laws regarding medical records protection are stricter than federal laws, which should be followed?

When state laws regarding medical records protection are stricter than federal laws, state laws should be followed. This principle is grounded in the idea that states have the authority to enact laws that provide greater protection for individuals’ privacy and sensitive health information than those established at the federal level. HIPAA, which stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, sets a baseline for privacy and security standards for health information, but it does allow states to impose stricter provisions.

Thus, when healthcare providers and organizations encounter situations where state regulations offer more stringent protections, they are legally obligated to comply with these regulations to ensure they are safeguarding patient information appropriately. This adherence not only helps in maintaining compliance with laws but also supports better trust and security concerning patient care and confidentiality.